A good letter to the bishops and its shameful response

Today the Vatican released a letter with its new guidelines in order to combat the cancer of child abuse by priests. It is part of the Church's response to the wave of accusations that has been taking place for years. No one can legitimately say that the Vatican is ignoring the issue, unless a deep rooted liberal hatred for everything sacred and holy is at place. And, sadly enough one more time, that is the case. Critics are disappointed with the Vatican's letter to the bishops. But it couldn't be the other way around. For them the Catholic Church is an ideological enemy. They want to see us finished. Today it becomes clearer to me that even if tomorrow the Vatican centralizes all the power possible to impose a solution from above, they would find any other argument, however unfair and contrary to common sense, and wield it against us one more time. In their hearts they don't care about the concrete cases of child abuse! That's just part of a discourse of discrediting the Church and its influence in the world, because of all their atheist ideology and secularist programme. Here there is the news in its more neutral content: http://www.monstersandcritics.

com/news/europe/news/article_1639478.php/Critics-dismiss-Vatican-guidlines-on-sex-abuse-by-clergy

For liberals it's not a matter of child abuse. They just simply hate the Church, and it happens that this is the most powerful discourse against it. That's all. All the liberal speech, unproductive as it is, is hypocritical ideology. They fill their mouths with fairness and justice, and when the Church tries to improve and move into that direction, they answer contemptuously to this improvement. If the Pope addresses the issue, they say it is not enough. If the Vatican appoints some people to draft a document to move forward a policy, they say it's ineffective and useless. Now the Church is telling the bishops to cooperate with the civil authorities, and they argue that it is all a cover up. Here there is a better account of the criticism: http://www.washingtontimes

.com/news/2011/may/16/vatican-suggests-bishops-report-abuse-police/?page=3

I will tell you what I think is behind the critics argument. The liberals solution is centralizing power! They want the Vatican to become some kind of modern big government to command directly the bishops in their tasks! Unbelievable isn't it?! Do they really think that the Pope is some kind of President or Prime Minister? A guy that just simply expands the Vatican's bureaucracy so that it acts as they want it to act? It doesn't work that way. The church is a federated body. It is the same argument all over again: in order to improve civil rights, give more power to the central authority. And if they do, then of course the Vatican's spendings will go up, and it will require more money, and then they will wield the old tautological argument that the Church only wants to take away your money from you, because in the end it's a business and not a honest religion, like if everything could be reduced to a merchant's ethos, or utilitarian morality. Here is an additional source in order to create more perspective: http://www.nytimes.com/201

1/05/17/world/europe/17vatican.html

Conclusion: so anywhere we see it, it will always be the same: (a) the Church is not doing enough with its "unbinding" rules, they say; ergo they must create binding rules. (b) But to have binding rules you need the bureaucratic apparatus to enforce the rules (basic common sense political knowledge); ergo you need to expand the central bureaucracy to reach the periphery of the Church in order to make sure that the bishops are obeying you. (c) So in order to make the rules binding, you need to spend more on your new expanded bureaucratic apparatus of regulation; ergo the Church need more resources and its gonna look for them. (d) The Church's expansion is a proof that the only thing they want is money from you! They are all fat hypocrites that don't care about your soul but about your pocket! Their presence is not only spurious (because Jesus story is a lie to manipulate the ignorant masses from which you form a part of, after all), but also costly and uneconomical; ergo, we should get rid of the Church! (An argument that has been stressed for a long time now, since the most infamous and shameful writer in the history of the West wrote; namely Voltaire). Better have that money in the pocket of the bourgeoisie that is giving you a job at least!!!

It all comes to the same thing, so it seems. Liberals, their secular programme and their atheist ideology want to see us all, the Catholic Church of God, extinguished. We shouldn't care about their argument; what matters to us is their final malignant goal.